Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2
Unconventional Implant Placement. 2: Placement of Implants Through Impacted Teeth. Three Case Reports
Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39
Follow Us      

LOGIN

   Official Journal of The Academy of Osseointegration

 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 29 , Issue 4
July/August 2009

Pages 405-413


Unconventional Implant Placement. 2: Placement of Implants Through Impacted Teeth. Three Case Reports

Mithridade Davarpanah/Serge Szmukler-Moncler


PMID: 19639061
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0868

The aim of this paper is to report on three patients who received unconventional implant treatment because of the presence of impacted teeth. To avoid invasive surgical removal of the impacted teeth and delayed implant treatment, implants were placed through the impacted teeth. Of the seven implants placed into four impacted teeth, all healed uneventfully except a short (8.5-mm) implant that became mobile after 4 months. One and three implants now have been loaded for 3.5 and 2 years, respectively. The two other implants were removed after 6 months of uneventful healing. These cases, although limited in number, suggest that implant placement through an impacted tooth might not interfere with implant integration or harm occlusal function, at least in the short term. More study is warranted before this unconventional procedure might be considered as a possible clinical option when, at an impacted tooth site, clinicians seek to avoid invasive surgery. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:405–413.)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help